![]() 08/13/2019 at 08:15 • Filed to: good morning oppo | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 08/13/2019 at 08:29 |
|
The coolest part about these had to have been the cross ram intake.
![]() 08/13/2019 at 08:33 |
|
huh?
![]() 08/13/2019 at 09:03 |
|
Aliens.
![]() 08/13/2019 at 09:17 |
|
The...cross ram intake available on Polara models with the Wedge engine.
![]() 08/13/2019 at 09:22 |
|
to me it’s a bizarre setup. i’m not aware of any Australian market cars with anything like that
![]() 08/13/2019 at 10:01 |
|
I believe the reasons here were, ability to fit a dual carburetor setup under a low hood, room for those extra carbs and ease of setting up carburetor heat risers, straight runners (to allow for easy airflow), and the usual reasons for a longer runner - good atomization and constructive resonance at low RPM.
Like this, but sideways instead of up:
![]() 08/13/2019 at 10:13 |
|
‘61 Dodge models and the ‘61 Fury were more alike in the sheet metal than it would appear at first glance. Here’s a D-5 00 with the nose of a Fury:
![]() 08/13/2019 at 10:19 |
|
Bingo. By increasing and tuning the length of the intake runners Chrysler could get more bottom and mid-range torque out of the same engine.
![]() 08/13/2019 at 10:27 |
|
Good looking cars.
08/13/2019 at 10:33 |
|
So did they also include a pair of Minis to help you in and out of parking spaces, or did you have to supply your own tugs?
![]() 08/13/2019 at 10:45 |
|
I’ve got the sneaking suspicion I’ve also seen a Polara/Dart family Dodge nose on a Fury, but I couldn’t seem to find it.
![]() 08/13/2019 at 10:56 |
|
![]() 08/13/2019 at 15:18 |
|
That’s because the Australian market is still trying to figure out which side the steering wheel belongs on. (They haven’t yet...)
![]() 08/13/2019 at 15:18 |
|
And condense more fuel on the way to the intake ports on cold mornings, I should think.
![]() 08/13/2019 at 19:36 |
|
Believe it or not, i ts actually smaller than the most popular family car on the market today.